Connect with us

Science

NASA funds Nokia plan to provide cellular service on moon

Published

on

ORLANDO, Fla., Oct. 15 (UPI) — NASA will fund a project by Nokia to build a 4G cellular communication network on the moon with $14.1 million, the space agency announced.

That project was part of $370 million in new contracts for lunar surface research missions NASA announced Wednesday. Most of the money went to large space companies like SpaceX and United Launch Alliance to perfect techniques to make and handle rocket propellant in space.

The space agency must quickly develop new technologies for living and working on the moon if it wants to realize its goal to have astronauts working at a lunar base by 2028, NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine said in a live broadcast.

“We need power systems that can last a long time on the surface of the moon, and we need habitation capability on the surface,” Bridenstine said.

Nokia of North America received the contract for the lunar communication project. Finland-based parent company Nokia owns the U.S. subsidiary.

Nokia and British firm Vodafone had announced their goal for a moon mission in 2018. They had planned to launch a lander and rovers built by Audi, utilizing a SpaceX rocket.

At the time, the companies said they would set down near the Apollo 17 landing site and have rovers examine the Lunar Roving Vehicle, or moon buggy, astronauts left behind in 1972. That launch never happened, but the new contract breathes life into Nokia’s plans for moon projects.

“The system could support lunar surface communications at greater distances, increased speeds and provide more reliability than current standards,” NASA noted in its contract award announcement.

Having cellular service on the moon could support communication between lunar landers, rovers, habitats and astronauts, said Jim Reuter, associate administrator for NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate.

“The system would also extend to spacecraft,” Reuter said. “With NASA funding, Nokia will look at how terrestrial technology could be modified for the lunar environment to support reliable, high-rate communications.”

Nokia didn’t respond to questions about the intended landing site for the company’s first mission. NASA hasn’t decided on a landing site for the agency’s Artemis missions, but Bridenstine reiterated Wednesday that the target is a site near water-ice deposits on the lunar South Pole.

The contracts are geared toward NASA’s Tipping Point program, which funds technologies that, if demonstrated successfully, are likely to be adopted by private industry.

“We want to build the [lunar] infrastructure…that is going to enable an international partnership for the biggest, broadest, most diverse inclusive coalition of researchers and explorers in the history of humankind,” Bridenstine said.

Other technologies funded Wednesday include demonstrations of lunar surface power generation and energy storage.

Houston-based Intuitive Machines, for example, will develop a “hopping robot” that could launch and carry small payloads from one lunar site to another.

And Alpha Space, also based in Houston, will create a small laboratory that could land on the moon’s surface and allow researchers to study how the extreme temperatures and radiation affect materials and electronics.

NASA’s 16 women astronauts — at least one likely to walk on moon

Tracy Caldwell Dyson pauses for a portrait in her spacesuit before going underwater in the Neutral Buoyancy Lab at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston on July 8, 2019. Photo by Bill Ingalls/UPI



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Science

Longer-lingering droplets are less efficient carriers of COVID-19 virus

Published

on

Oct. 27 (UPI) — New research — published Tuesday in the journal Physics of Fluids — suggests bigger, short-lived aerosol droplets pose a much greater risk of spreading COVID-19 than aerosol microdroplets, which are tiny particles that linger longest in the air.

To better understand the behavior and virus-carrying potential of different types of aerosol droplets, researchers had volunteers breathe, speak and cough into a laser beam, which recorded the size and distribution of the array of aerosolized particles.

Researchers used a Rayleigh jet nozzle chip to generate the same distribution of droplets.

The jet released aerosol droplets composed of 1 percent glycerol and 99 percent ethanol into a chamber. A sheet of laser light running across the middle of the chamber allowed researchers to track the movements of different sized droplets as they moved through the chamber.

Researchers relied on computer models to analyze the disease transmission risk posed by different droplet sizes.

“What we used are simple models for the evaporation and sedimentation, or falling down, of the droplets,” lead study author Daniel Bonn told UPI in an email.

“Together with the measured drop size distribution, this allows us to model the concentration of aerosols in a given room as a function of the time since for instance a patient coughed,” said Bonn, a physicist and the director of the University of Amsterdam’s Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute.

Though microdroplets produced by breathing and talking can remain airborne for longer, they carry much less virus than larger droplets produced by coughs.

“The large drops that are the reason for social distancing are roughly a hundred times larger in diameter than the aerosols, and so contain a million times more virus,” Bonn said.

The models developed by Bonn and his colleagues showed the smallest, longest-lingering particles are relatively inefficient carriers of COVID-19.

That doesn’t mean airborne transmission can’t happen — however, the findings suggest the vast majority of airborne transmission isn’t happening at grocery stores, airports, or larger, well-ventilated public spaces.

According to Bonn and his colleagues, microdroplet transmission is most likely happening in poorly ventilated spaces where groups of people are spending long periods of time in close proximity.

“Avoid small ill-ventilated spaces with too many people in it, take care of good building ventilation, open doors and windows and so on,” Bonn said. “Identify and possibly isolate super-shedders.”

Scientists continue to gain new insights into the behavior to virus-carrying aerosols, including the effects of air flow and humidity on droplet movements, but a comprehensive understanding of the role different droplets play in COVID-19 transmission remains elusive.

“What is needed is a detailed understanding of the reproduction number R, that virologists, aerosol scientists and all other agree with,” Bonn said. “This will help fighting the pandemic, and that is what we need. We have provided a potentially important step towards this goal here, but much experimental, modeling and virology work remains.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Science

Mountain gorillas friendly with neighbors outside of core home ranges

Published

on

Oct. 28 (UPI) — Mountain gorillas are surprisingly neighborly.

According to a new study published Wednesday in the Journal of Animal Ecology, mountain gorillas act friendly with neighboring gorillas, as long as they stay out of the “core” parts of their territory.

Mountain gorillas occupy what scientists call a “core home range” and a wider “peripheral” range. The apes organize themselves in close-knit groups — eating, sleeping and playing within each range.

Sometimes, groups of mountain gorillas split permanently. When they do, closely related gorillas can find themselves living apart after years of companionship.

The latest study showed old friends and relatives recognize one another years later. Researchers found groups of mountain gorillas that once lived together are four times more likely to be friendly with one another, even a decade after a group’s split.

Non-group members aren’t tolerated in the core home range, no matter what. But in the peripheral range, familiar neighbors mingle peacefully.

Scientists arrived at their conclusions after analyzing 16 years worth of data on the simultaneous movement and interaction patterns of 17 mountain gorilla groups in Rwanda’s Volcanoes National Park.

“Meetings of groups are fairly rare, and at first both groups are usually cautious,” Robin Morrison, a biological anthropologist with the University of Exeter’s Center for Research in Animal Behavior, said in a news release.

Upon meeting, gorillas often beat their chests to demonstrate strength. Interactions can either turn aggressive, with fighting and yelling, or they turn friendly — or what scientists call “affiliative.”

“In affiliative interactions, the initial tension passes and the groups intermingle,” Morrison said. “They may rest together, and younger gorillas will often play with youngsters from the other group.”

Humans maintain friendly relations and cooperate with large numbers of individuals outside their immediate groups. Some scientists have theorized that the evolution of this socializing pattern allowed humans to take advantage of shared resources and space without the risk of violence.

Scientists suggest their study of mountain gorillas supports such a theory.

“The pattern we found mirrors what we see in humans,” Morrison said. “We also have concepts of public spaces outside our ‘range’ where we tolerate anyone, spaces like our homes where we tolerate certain individuals, and private spaces within those homes reserved for close family or just ourselves.”

The latest findings could also aid conservation planning. Mountain gorilla numbers are actually growing, thanks to effective conservation efforts, but the species’ available habitat is shrinking. The species have less than 300 square miles of habitat remaining.

“Understanding how groups interact and share their limited space is important for estimating future population dynamics and trends in this endangered species,” said study co-author Jean Paul Hirwa, gorilla program manager at the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund.



Source link

Continue Reading

Science

Giant lizards improved their flying abilities over millions of years

Published

on

Oct. 28 (UPI) — During their 150 million-year existence, pterodactyls and other winged reptiles known as pterosaurs steadily improved their flying abilities.

According to a paper published Wednesday in the journal Nature, pterosaurs doubled their flying efficiency over the course of their evolutionary history.

Unfortunately, their improved flying couldn’t save them from the extinction event that wiped out the dinosaurs 66 million years ago.

For the study, scientists analyzed the pterosaur fossil record using a new model designed to measure the flight efficiency of modern birds. The data showed pterosaurs didn’t benefit from major evolutionary breakthrough.

Instead, the winged reptiles made small physiological improvements over the course of their existence, slowly but steadily improving their flying prowess.

“Pterosaurs were a diverse group of winged lizards, with some the size of sparrows and others with the wingspan of a light aircraft,” lead study author Chris Venditti said in a news release.

“Fans of the movie Jurassic World will have seen a dramatization of just how huge and lethal these creatures would have been. Their diet consisted mostly of other animals, from insects to smaller dinosaurs,” said Venditti, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Reading in Britain.

Numerous studies have showcased the process of natural selection across small timescales, but identifying efficiency improvements across longer timescales has proven difficult.

“Our new method has allowed us to study long-term evolution in a completely new way, and answer this question at last by comparing the creatures at different stages of their evolutionary sequence over many millions of years,” Venditti said.

Scientists analyzed the shifting skeletal structures and dimensions of 75 pterosaur species over 150 million years. Though most pterosaurs doubled their flying efficiency, researchers found one group invested their evolutionary capital in size.

Azhdarchoids, researchers found, got bigger but not better at flying. Their size advantage allowed them to overcome their pedestrian flying abilities. One group member, Quetzlcoatlus, grew as long as a giraffe.

“This is unique evidence that although these animals were competent fliers, they probably spent much of their time on the ground,” said study co-author Joanna Baker, evolutionary biologist at Reading. “Highly efficient flight probably didn’t offer them much of an advantage, and our finding that they had smaller wings for their body size is in line with fossil evidence for their reduced reliance on flight.”

Not all Jurassic species that took to the skies were able to achieve longevity.

Research published earlier this month revealed the evolutionary failures of a pair of gliding dinosaur species. Outcompeted by birds from below and pterosaurs from above, the gliding species Yi and Ambopteryx never had the chance to evolve improved flying abilities.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending